Comments on: MoSneaky -Willis McGahee http://www.mosneaky.com/site/willis-mcgahee-rb-baltimore-ravens 2007 Fantasy Football Draft Resource Sat, 17 May 2008 00:19:28 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3 By: admin http://www.mosneaky.com/site/willis-mcgahee-rb-baltimore-ravens#comment-6 admin Mon, 18 Jun 2007 03:18:37 +0000 http://www.mosneaky.com/site/willis-mcgahee-rb-baltimore-ravens#comment-6 In response to the comments pasted at the end... On many accounts we have to agree with you. We'd be lying if we admit that part of the reason we chose McGahee as a "sleeper" is the total void of other potential candidates on Baltimore. They have a complete lack of offensive weapons this year, and if there is one contender to improve most drastically upon his '06 numbers, it would be McGahee. Which leads us to the next point... Based strictly on his 2006 numbers, McGahee doesn't deserve to be an early draft pick. You are correct in the assumption that owners will still take him early in drafts, but that is really still on name basis, not because he earned that respect based on his 2006 production. In conclusion. We're both right. McGahee isn't much of a stretch. But he will have the best numbers improvement, and is the lone Raven you can expect to accomplish the feat of "self-improvement". Thanks for the comments! Keep them coming everyone! Comments can be posted at the bottom of every Sleeper/Bust article. The MoSneaky Staff >FanProphet said >am June 17 2007 @ 6:45 pm · Edit > >McGahee is hardly a sleeper and if he makes it out of >the 2nd round I want to play in that league. Brandon >Jacobs may be a sleeper that slips to the 5th round >or so but McGahee being a proven talent and on a >Super Bowl contender will have an excellent year. > >-FanProphet In response to the comments pasted at the end…

On many accounts we have to agree with you. We’d be lying if we admit that part of the reason we chose McGahee as a “sleeper” is the total void of other potential candidates on Baltimore. They have a complete lack of offensive weapons this year, and if there is one contender to improve most drastically upon his ‘06 numbers, it would be McGahee. Which leads us to the next point…

Based strictly on his 2006 numbers, McGahee doesn’t deserve to be an early draft pick. You are correct in the assumption that owners will still take him early in drafts, but that is really still on name basis, not because he earned that respect based on his 2006 production.

In conclusion.
We’re both right. McGahee isn’t much of a stretch. But he will have the best numbers improvement, and is the lone Raven you can expect to accomplish the feat of “self-improvement”.

Thanks for the comments! Keep them coming everyone!
Comments can be posted at the bottom of every Sleeper/Bust article.

The MoSneaky Staff

>FanProphet said
>am June 17 2007 @ 6:45 pm · Edit
>
>McGahee is hardly a sleeper and if he makes it out of >the 2nd round I want to play in that league. Brandon >Jacobs may be a sleeper that slips to the 5th round >or so but McGahee being a proven talent and on a >Super Bowl contender will have an excellent year.
>
>-FanProphet

]]>